codingthearchitecture.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the codingthearchitecture.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host codingthearchitecture.com. Currently, hosted in Singapore and its service provider is CloudFlare Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

blog presentations books training << previous | home today's software developers are the ivory tower architects of tomorrow having run my software architecture kata for thousands of people across the globe, i can now pretty much predict what's going to happen. during the initial iteration, groups of people are asked to design a software solution given a set of requirements, with the output of this exercise being one or more diagrams to illustrate their solution. literally moments before the exercise starts, we talk about "significant decisions" and "architectural drivers". everybody agrees that technology decisions are important for a number of reasons; including cost, team skillset, organisational standards, etc. on reviewing the diagrams though, upwards of 90% of them will not have any technology mentioned whatsoever. when i ask why the diagrams don't include information about technology, the responses are typically along the lines of: "the solution is simple and can be built with any technology" "we don't want to force a solution on developers" "we want the team to decide" "it's an implementation detail" "we follow the 'last responsible moment' principle" "everybody knows that we use java" there are a couple of separate discussions to have here about not properly engaging in the problem space , and that technology does actually have an influence upon the resulting design. fundamentally though, not considering some of the implementation details (even at a high level) leads to a very superficial view of the solution. this is evidenced in iteration 2 of the architecture kata, where i encourage groups to illustrate their solutions using the c4 model . although one of the goals is to create better diagrams, the groups are "forced" to have much richer design discussions in order to create the detail needed for these diagrams. many groups will actually modify their designs because they realise they won't work. this feedback is a good thing, because no code has been written at this point. back to the point of this post. imagine that, as a developer, you receive or are presented the type of designs that emerge from iteration 1 of the architecture kata. it's all very high level, very fluffy, very conceptual and very light on technical details. most of the software developers i work with during my training are understandably wary about "ivory tower" or "solution" architects, who are removed from the day to day job of building software and talk about ideal or conceptual solutions. yet these same developers are doing exactly the same thing by not considering technology when designing software. unless we change this situation, today's software developers are going to be the ivory tower architects of tomorrow. posted by simon brown on 09 february 2018 14:22:00 gmt # evolutionary design still requires up front thinking there's a great post by joshua kerievsky titled the day we stopped sprinting that itself references an older post called evolutionary design , which talks about the need to create a "primitive whole" initially, before iterating to improve it over time. the important thing to note here is that the primitive whole isn't just a bunch of unassembled parts, it's a "under-developed whole" and something that does work (to some extent, anyway). the example used in the illustration is a guitar, with the first version being something that looks like a very primitive guitar. something that's often missed here, or not discussed explicitly, is that you still need to do some up front thinking in order to get to that primitive whole , and to create an initial vision or starting point. after all, the primitive guitar is still a guitar, which implies that somebody somewhere had a vision early on that a guitar was the thing that was needed. in my experience, i've seen many teams misinterpret "evolutionary design" and "emergent architecture" to mean, "you don't need to do any design up front at all". as dave thomas says, "big design up front is dumb, but doing no design up front is even dumber". during my software architecture workshops, i occasionally see teams draw nothing more than a visual summary of the requirements when asked to work in groups and design a software solution. the requirements are based upon a "financial risk system" for a bank, and sometimes groups will literally just draw a box labelled "financial risk system" before proudly proclaiming, "that's all of the up front design we need to do, we're agile". yes, this really has , and still does happen from time to time. engaging with the problem many years ago, my boss gave me a small internal software project to work on. i don't remember the exact details, but he basically gave me a problem statement and told me to design a software solution. after a couple of hours, i presented my solution. it was instantly ripped apart and he told me that i hadn't properly engaged with the problem. he was right. i'd presented a very simple solution that didn't cater for any of the complexity of the problem space, mainly because i hadn't actually uncovered it yet. on my travels around the world, i regularly see the same thing, and people really struggle with the concept of doing up front design. many of them also never really engage their minds in the problem, evidenced by one or more diagrams that present a very simplified and superficial view of the solution, such as the typical "logical view" diagrams below. whenever i'm doing an up front design exercise, i want it to be quick and efficient while still providing as much value as possible. the process of doing some up front design provides you with a way to engage with the problem space and create a starting point for your vision of the thing you want to build. for me, doing up front design is about understanding the structure of the thing you're going to build, creating a starting point and vision for the team to work with and identifying/mitigating the highest priority risks . as i've discovered, a simple way to make this happen is to encourage people to actually produce some lightweight yet structured artifacts, like the diagrams in my c4 model , as a part of the design process. when they do this, conversations change because it forces people to engage with the problem. up front design is therefore a crucial part of a longer evolutionary design process. without it, you're just lost. posted by simon brown on 11 october 2017 09:56:02 bst # paas for java developers - part 4 previous parts of this blog post series have provided an overview of cloud foundry from a number of different perspectives; including the high-level concepts , vendor lock-in and the pivotal web services marketplace services . in this part, we'll look at how cloud foundry makes it trivial to perform zero-downtime deployments. blue-green deployments as a quick introduction to this topic, imagine that you have a java web application running somewhere. a simple way to upgrade that application to a new version is to stop the application, update the relevant deployment artifacts (e.g. a .jar or .war file), and then restart it. some web application servers provide support for hot-swapping applications, but the principle is the same. although this works, users of your application are likely to encounter downtime because the application will be unavailable for a short period of time. over the years, we've created a number of techniques to deal with this issue, one of the most popular being blue-green deployments , where a (physical or virtual) router is used to switch traffic from one running instance of your application to another. although this might sound like an advanced technique, tools like cloud foundry make this feasible for teams of any size to achieve. as we saw in previous blog posts, structurizr consists of two java/spring web applications; a "web application" (serving html, css and javascript) and an "api application" (allowing clients to get or put software architecture workspaces

URL analysis for codingthearchitecture.com

http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/10/10/paas_for_java_developers_part_4.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/responses/rss.xml?entry=1506612089263
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/05/06/grouping_components_by_use_case.html#responses
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2016/12/08/plantuml_and_structurizr.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/10/11/evolutionary_design_still_requires_up_front_thinking.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/04/27/visualising_and_documenting_software_architecture_cheat_sheets.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/04/27/visualising_and_documenting_software_architecture_cheat_sheets.html#responses
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/09/29/paas_for_java_developers_part_3.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/presentations/
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/09/28/paas_for_java_developers_part_2.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2016/12/08/plantuml_and_structurizr.html#responses
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/responses/rss.xml?entry=1481189321125
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/responses/rss.xml?entry=1504003560000
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/blogentries/2.html
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2017/05/06/grouping_components_by_use_case.html
blglobal.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: CODINGTHEARCHITECTURE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 970077063_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2018-05-04T11:15:55Z
Creation Date: 2007-05-11T23:46:08Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-05-11T23:46:08Z
Registrar: eNom, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NEWT.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: REZA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-06-23T21:15:51Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR eNom, Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =codingthearchitecture.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME codingthearchitecture.com

  CHANGED 2018-05-04

  CREATED 2007-05-11

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NEWT.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.59.212

  REZA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM 173.245.58.217

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .